As we enter the 2011 commonwealth election cycle, there are a number of proposals coming from Republican sources that rely on bonds to pay for needed improvements to our infrastructure. The problem with that is the fact the none of these bonds come with an attendant new source of funding to service them in the long-term. In essence, these proposals put major new expenditures on Virginia’s state credit card, leaving us with the bill after the Governor (and others) leave office.
The issue of addressing Virginia’s (and Loudoun’s) needs is not one of financing, but one of funding.
Governor McDonnell’s proposal is perhaps the most prominent.
As part of his budget amendments presented in Richmond in December, McDonnell said he wants to help pay for $4 billion in new transportation spending by issuing $3 billion in bonds. Pulling in more money for road improvements is a major component of the governor’s initiatives for the upcoming 2011 legislative session, which starts Jan. 12. – The Loudoun Times-Mirror
The Loudoun Times gets it right in using the language “pulling in more money” rather than saying “finding new money.” The money the governor proposes to use is already in the Commonwealth’s financing plan for the long-term. He just wants to spend all of it, now. He wants to max out the state credit card on the first of the month. Which begs the question, how will we finance needed improvements in three or five years, when those bonds were already issued?
Follow below for a rough lesson in fiscal policy. A similar argument is advanced by Leesburg Councilmember Ken Reid, in terms of the Silver Line and the Dulles toll Road.
Therefore, I have been proposing to several Fairfax and Loudoun supervisors, and state officials, to have the state take back the Dulles Rail project from the Airports Authority, use state-backed bonds for construction and apply for federal mass transit New Starts funding for Phase II. – Ken Reid, Leesburg Patch
Leaving aside for the moment the irony of Council member Reid, who voted against essential maintenance of roads in Leesburg, advocating for more local control of the most significant transportation improvement in our region’s history, Reid’s “use state-backed bonds” plan is a dead letter from the start. The Governor’s plan already uses up all the state’s debt capacity. Furthermore, even if those bonds were available to apply to the Silver Line, getting Assembly buy-in for allocating them in that manner is no slam-dunk. And this is ignoring the fact that the cost of issuing and maintaining bonds (interest rates) is getting higher, not lower, for local governments.
Ultimately, however, the procedural niceties of using bonds pale in comparison with the risks to our Commonwealth’s future of issuing bonds without an attendant funding source to service them.
When we issue bonds, we need to pay them down, and pay the interest on them, every year. That money comes directly out of general (tax, fees, etc.) revenues. If we issue more debt without finding a way to also increase general revenues, we must, necessarily, allocate more future revenues from a fixed pot to debt service. When we do that, we leave ourselves less money to maintain our roads in the future. The money we could use in 2014 to pay for road maintenance and construction would have to go to servicing the bonds issued in 2011. Yes, issuing bonds so we will have more money for roads today will actually leave us with far less (not more) money for roads tomorrow!
The Governor and Mr. Reid’s proposals boil down to “let’s get another credit card, and max that one out.” Any financial advisor, or high-school student with a job and a credit card, can tell you that you don’t get a new credit card unless you have gotten a raise. Well, the Governor and Mr. Reid have proposed no way to give the state coffers a raise. Maxing out the state’s debt today is not just imprudent, it is fiscally reckless.
Virginia has a long, and worthy, tradition of fiscal astuteness. The last time we tried a financing-without-funding scheme, we were promised “no car tax.”
How did that work out?
It is up to the people of Virginia, and Loudoun, to be the parents in this analogy. we must send a message to Mr. McDonnell and his allies like Mr. Reid, that new debt without new funding sources is irresponsible. It puts our commonwealth’s future at risk for the sake of a political goal today.
Virginia is better than that. Virginia deserves better from our elected officials, at every level.
[Update] – Sen. Herring makes this point in response to the Governor’s State of the Commonwealth address, demonstrating real leadership.
He also questioned the governor’s proposal to borrow $3 billion for transportation and transit projects. McDonnell’s plan doesn’t provide a long-term funding solution to fix northern Virginia’s congested roads, and it doesn’t provide a revenue stream to repay the bonds, Herring said.
“What are we going to do over the next 17 years while we’re repaying this? (McDonnell) kind of punted the problem to his successor instead of being bold and dealing with it now,” Herring said. “On the other hand, this is something I’m going to have to look at very carefully. We’ve got some of the worst traffic in the nation.” – Sen. Mark Herring