U. S. Senators Mark Warner and Tim Kaine along with Governor Terry McAuliffe have endangered Myrtle Beach and the Outer Banks and, more generally, our Atlantic coastal waters.
They support foul and dirty development in the waters offshore, fighting for the right of the toxic fossil fuel industry to drill for gas and oil.
They are most reassuring. You know that soft tonal incantation politicians hone to reassure us that all will be just fine. It makes you scream. You want to shout, “Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire.”
We can still remember the Deepwater Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010. The BP spokespersons enunciated in soft oleaginous tones, “It will be just fine.” But they weren’t even close.
The White House closed off drilling in the Atlantic Coastal waters after the disastrous BP spill. Anything else would have been unreasonable. We witnessed in relentless television and print and digital coverage how the Horizon disaster killed tourism, how few flocked to oil-stained beaches wanting to see mired birds dying, and how the fishing industry had nowhere to go but down.
Now President Barack Obama has reversed field, caving to pressure from the fossil fuel giants who want oil and gas drill rigs in place from Virginia to Georgia.
We are still unsafe because the reforms in the industry range from moderate to nothing at all when it comes to avoiding the risk of an oil spill or a blowout.
We propose to drill for more oil and gas when there’s an oil glut prompting consumer glee at the pump. Reduced oil prices have influenced oil producers to cut production.
Meanwhile, are we about to put in place the conditions to have another disaster?
Myrtle Beach had 15.2 million visitors in 2012, 37% up from 2005. Our elected representatives are putting at risk Virginia’s tourism industry that accounted for 200,000 jobs in 2011 and worth about $20 billion in income. Virginia’s beaches attracted about 10% of the Commonwealth’s tourists. Fisherman caught 247,000 tons of seafood, valued at $191 million.
The oil and gas industry leans on our elected officials, and wins an inside track with contributions and favors, hungry to get at the 2 billion barrels of oil believed to be beneath the waters of the mid and South Atlantic.
Some Democrats to the North are up in arms, attacking the proposed drilling because, as Sen. Edward Markey reportedly said, “A spill in North Carolina could affect Massachusetts.” For certain, it will affect the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Are we too late to rumble and reject this ill-considered attack on flourishing industries so that oil and gas men can get even more oil and gas?
Not if we object to the scope of the five-year drilling plan and demand the ban on drilling remain in place.
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) can limit the proposed 5-year plan – so that the public comment period may be the last hope to save the Atlantic Coast from the industry’s past reckless practices.
Incidentally, the oil and gas industry wants even more drilling in the federally owned coastal Arctic waters considered especially fragile.
You may think that Alaskan citizens breathed a sigh of relief – and they may have. But Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski complains that Alaska is thought of as a “nice little snow globe” and denying the industry the right to drill is a “kick to the gut of Alaska’s economy.”
Let’s face it, if we can’t tell this industry, “Don’t go near the water,” then we may not want to go or be able to go near the waters ourselves.
I grew up in the Florida Keys where we had a beautiful reef to protect. You are a terrible writer In dire need on how to write logically.. The gulfstream will take the oil to Great Britain, if there is any.